Following the Budget’s announcement of tax incentives for Occupational Health Services, Susan Bourke, Head of Risk & Health at independent consultancy Broadstone, explains why the reforms won’t go as far as the industry needs them to, and why it was mistake not to include Group Income Protection in the support package.
 
She said: “It is a positive step from the Government to acknowledge the impact that Occupational Health Services have in supporting employee’s health. Any potential tax incentives to boost take up will be welcome as will professional accreditation in what is a rapidly growing and varied sector.”
“Unfortunately, the Government have come short on what could have been an incredible opportunity to put Health and Wellbeing of employees’ centre stage and provide support for people to maintain their health and assist them with a return to work if they do suffer illness or injury.
“The absence of any mention of other essential benefits within the occupational health pilot study is disappointing, as Group Income Protection would have been an ideal addition to complement and add value to the pilot.”
“Many employers already provide Group Income Protection cover for their workforce which not only provides financial assistance for members whilst they are unable to work (thus reducing the need for government support),but also actively manages employee absence and encourages a supported return to work with the use of Early Intervention Services, Rehabilitation, nurse led support and a host of added value services that promote health.
“Let’s hope this pilot is the first of many in identifying the significant impact that employer funded support services can provide.”